top of page

RESPECT WORKS PLAYBOOK

Section one: What is a respectful workplace?

This Playbook section defines a respectful workplace around four core elements—psychological safety, civility & professionalism, welcoming workplace, and fairness for all—tailored to construction. It explains why respect matters: improving safety, productivity, retention, and well-being, while reducing turnover costs, incivility, and toxic culture, backed by extensive research citations and workplace statistics.

What is a respectful workplace and why does it matter?

A respectful workplace is one in which all employees feel safe, valued, and are treated with dignity. Respectful workplaces are characterized by psychological safety, civility and professionalism, a welcoming work environment, and fairness for all. In a respectful workplace, inappropriate communication, rude behavior, discrimination, harassment, and bullying are not tolerated and policies and procedures for reporting incidences of disrespectful and harmful behaviors are enforced and well understood by all employees. Respectful workplace culture has repeatedly been shown to improve employee engagement, behavior, and overall well-being (1,2). When employees work in a toxic culture, they experience higher rates of stress, depression, and various other adverse physical and psychological outcomes (3,4). These issues also translate into organizational challenges, including lower economic viability, higher rates of turnover, lower retention, and lost revenue due to inefficiency (5,6). Understanding the elements of positive workplace culture and how to effectively implement strategies for maintaining respect in the workplace has benefits for both employees and employers (7,8,9). These issues are particularly salient for the construction industry. Construction workers experience some of the highest rates of psychological stress, substance abuse, and suicide (10), while workplace bullying is a prevalent feature of construction culture (11). These conditions are not only detrimental to worker health and well-being but should concern any construction company seeking to recruit and retain employees, strengthen market position, and improve productivity and profitability (12). Hiring and retention are persistent challenges in the industry, with 88% of construction firms reporting difficulty (13). Ensuring a positive and inclusive workplace environment is one of the most effective and cost-efficient ways to reduce turnover and improve recruitment and retention (14,15). In fact, toxic company culture has been shown to be ten times more likely to predict turnover than compensation levels (16,17), and turnover resulting from toxic work culture costs US employers an estimated $50 billion annually (18).

1,

Respectful workplaces are safe workplaces

Building respectful workplace culture in the construction industry serves not only to attract and retain workers: it can also advance workplace safety by reducing accidents and injuries and improving work quality (19,20). High turnover in the construction industry can lead to dangerous mistakes due to a lack of familiarity with safety protocols, strain on existing teams, and disruption of the culture. This can result in injuries, legal risks, and increased insurance premiums (21). Occupational safety and health professionals increasingly recognize that the organizational and interpersonal aspects of work can be just as hazardous as the physical environment. When workers are exposed to “psycho-social” hazards on the jobsite due to poor management or inappropriate behavior by supervisors or co-workers, they can easily become frustrated, distracted or distraught. As a result, they are less able to concentrate and more likely to make mistakes, inadvertently putting themselves and their team members at risk (22). Respectful workplace practices address these behavioral issues that contribute to high turnover, helping to create a safer and more productive workplace for all.

Core elements of a respectful workplace

Workplace culture is dynamic and multifaceted, involving many interrelated elements that contribute to whether it is inclusive and empowering or toxic and exclusionary. Research shows that organizations across different sectors with respectful workplace cultures exhibit three key qualities: (1) trust between people, (2) an environment free from harassment, discrimination, and racism, and (3) an active prioritization of inclusion23. Our research has found that an inclusive work environment often also involves fairness, justice, and courteous interpersonal interactions. Based on these findings, we have built our framework around four core elements of a respectful workplace that align with these positive workplace characteristics: Psychological Safety, Civility and Professionalism, Welcoming Workplace, and Fairness for All. This framework has been tailored to fit the specific needs and characteristics of the construction industry, addressing both organizational culture and jobsite culture to reduce psychological harms. Let’s start with some general definitions of the four core elements:

Psychological safety

Psychological safety is fundamental to a respectful workplace, and research has shown it to be integral to team success. It refers to the shared belief that the workplace is safe for interpersonal risk-taking (24). Psychological safety means individuals feel comfortable being themselves, expressing concerns, admitting mistakes, making suggestions for improvement, and engaging in difficult conversations without fear of retaliation or negative consequences to their image, status, or career (25). This sense of safety is shaped and reinforced by organizational culture, policies, and leadership practices. When a work environment is psychologically safe, workers are much more likely to engage fully, offer up their best ideas, and give their all (26). Accordingly, psychological safety is a key component of high functioning teams. Research shows that psychologically safe work environments foster continuous learning and employee engagement; on average, they exhibit more innovation and higher quality workmanship than fear-based work environments. Without psychological safety, construction workers may not speak up about safety hazards, inefficient processes, or troubling behavior for fear of retaliation or punishment (27,28,29,30). Unattended, these issues can result in serious financial and reputational damage for employers (31).

Civility and professionalism

Civility refers to respectful, courteous behavior characterized by politeness, regard for others, and adherence to workplace norms of respect (32,33). It involves treating colleagues with dignity, actively listening, demonstrating empathy, and engaging in constructive communication (34). Civility also includes the ability to express disagreement or navigate conflict, showing a sincere willingness to engage in meaningful dialogue and seek common ground (35). Workplace civility has been shown to have positive outcomes on both job satisfaction and organizational outcomes (36).

 

The inverse of civility is incivility. Incivility can spiral throughout the workplace quickly and escalate from rude comments, to yelling or cursing at someone, to a violent outburst. This is especially true in high stress work environments such as construction that often fail to recognize the importance of civility (37). Unaddressed, incivility is a risk factor for more severe forms of mistreatment.

 

Professionalism refers to a set of standards an individual is expected to adhere to in the workplace (38). It typically encompasses conduct such as reliability and accountability, competence in one’s job skills, integrity and ethics, communication and conflict management skills, attitudes and behaviors in the workplace, and situational awareness (39).

Welcoming workplace

A welcoming workplace is an environment in which individuals from diverse backgrounds feel respected, valued, and empowered to contribute fully (40). Inclusive workplaces have been shown to be positively correlated with employee health and mental well-being (41,42) and have positive impacts on organizational productivity (43). It is both a relational and organizational construct, characterized by mutual respect, strong social connections, openness to learning, and collaborative decision-making (44). Welcoming workplaces recognize and integrate diversity, support individual and collective efforts, and ensure that everyone has the voice, space, and resources to thrive and contribute meaningfully. Today’s workplace includes four different generations ranging from Baby Boomers to Gen Z, each with different life experiences, perspectives, and values. Workplaces today are vastly more diverse than they were in the past: in addition to generational diversity, gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion, education, and politics all come into play at the jobsite. A welcoming workplace makes sure everyone feels included regardless of where they are from and how they vary from one another. Leaders in a welcoming workplace foster belonging by creating an environment that allows everyone to contribute meaningfully, which is an important step to creating psychological safety and physical well-being.

Fairness for all

Fairness for all refers to employees’ perceptions of how opportunities, resources, outcomes, and treatment are distributed in the workplace (45). It involves the employer recognizing and valuing employees based on their skills and contributions, ensuring that processes are fair, transparent, and inclusive, and that individuals are treated with honesty and respect in both decisions and interactions (46). Workplace fairness has also been found to be a crucial dimension in boosting performance and organizational citizenship behaviors in the workplace, and building an inclusive, welcoming workplace (47,48,49,50).

 

Employees want fairness at work. They want an equal opportunity to contribute and grow (51). Policies and procedures rooted in fairness, which are uniformly and consistently applied, allow employees to know what is expected and what is tolerated (52). Employees who are treated fairly have higher trust in their employer and supervisors (53). Lack of fairness is demotivating for workers and a key factor in turnover (54). Lack of fairness may also be considered unethical depending on the circumstances and violate the psychological contract.

 

Fairness doesn’t always mean treating everyone the same, however. Employees have different abilities, skills, and needs. An employer committed to fairness and equity will ensure that all employees have what they need to perform their best. For example, women on construction jobsites need personal protective equipment that fits their frames. This PPE will be different from what most men need. In this case, treating groups fairly means offering them different PPE.

Respect in the workplace is good for business

Fostering a workplace culture that is psychologically safe, civil, professional, welcoming, and fair is vital for attracting and retaining workers in the construction industry. It also makes good business sense. A large and growing body of research in occupational safety and health demonstrates the relationship between respect in the workplace and improved performance. Respectful workplaces improve productivity, performance, and engagement. By contrast, workplaces with toxic culture characterized by lack of respect, exclusion, harassment and discrimination, and unethical behavior experience higher turnover, lower productivity and greater safety risks.

 

Turnover and retention

  • One-in-five workers have left a job because of toxic culture (SHRM, 2019)

  • Feeling disrespected at work has the largest impact on how employees rate organizational culture of all workplace attributes (Sull, et. al., 2022)

  • Employee turnover as a result of toxic work culture costs US employers an estimated $50 billion a year (SHRM, 2019)

  • Turnover due to workplace culture over the past five years has cost companies $223 Billion (SHRM, 2019)

  • Toxic company culture is 10 times more likely to predict turnover than compensation levels (Sull, et al., 2022)

 

Productivity and safety 

  • Associated General Contractors estimates that construction companies lose on average $137,000 annually due to loss in productivity because of exclusive workplace behavior (AGC, 2026)

  • Employees lose an average of 17.2 hours of paid time per incident of exclusionary behavior (Clayton, 2018)

  • Nearly half of employees who experience incivility at work decrease their effort and time spent at work (Porath and Pearson, 2013)']

  • 65% of workers who experienced exclusionary behavior said they would leave or consider leaving if they found another job (Clayton, 2018)

  • Employees who experience unjust workplaces are 35-55% more likely to suffer from a major disease, resulting in time away from work (Goh and Pfeffer, 2016)

  • Inclusive teams with open communication and high levels of engagement experience 22% fewer safety incidents compared to less engaged teams. (Gallup.com, 2023)

Anchor 1
Anchor 2
Anchor 3
Anchor 4
Anchor 5
Anchor 6
Anchor 7
Anchor 8
Anchor 9
Anchor 10
Anchor 11
Anchor 12
Anchor 13
Anchor 14
Anchor 15
Anchor 16
Anchor 17
Anchor 18
Anchor 19
Anchor 20
Anchor 21
Anchor 22
Anchor 23
Anchor 24
Anchor 25
Anchor 26
Anchor 27
Anchor 28
Anchor 29
Anchor 30
Anchor 31
Anchor 32
Anchor 33
Anchor 34
Anchor 35
Anchor 36
Anchor 37
Anchor 38
Anchor 39
Anchor 40
Anchor 41
Anchor 42
Anchor 43
Anchor 44
Anchor 45
Anchor 46
Anchor 47
Anchor 48
Anchor 49
Anchor 50
Anchor 51
Anchor 52
Anchor 53
Anchor 54
Anchor 55

Notes:

  1. Bamel, N., et al. (2020). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention: A study of the construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management.

  2. Lee, M., & Kim, B. (2023). Effect of Employee Experience on Organizational Commitment: Case of South Korea. Behavioral Sciences, 13(7), 521.

  3. De Castro, A. B., Gee, G. C., & Takeuchi, D. T. (2008). Workplace discrimination and health among Filipinos in the United States.

  4. Zambrana, R. E., et al. (2020). The impact of workplace culture on mental health: A study of low-wage workers.

  5. Perrenoud, A. J., Bigelow, B. F., & Perkins, E. M. (2020). Advancing women in construction: Gender differences in attraction and retention factors with managers in the electrical construction industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(5), 04020043

  6. Zhang, R. P., et al. (2021). Does gender really matter? A closer look at early career women in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 39(8), 669-686

  7. De Castro, A. B., Gee, G. C., & Takeuchi, D. T. (2008). Workplace discrimination and health among Filipinos in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 98(3), 520-526

  8. Kaplan, S., Wiley, J. W., & Maertz, C. P. (2011). The role of employee engagement in the quality of guest services: A study of hotels in India. Journal of Business and Management, 17(1), 31-51.

  9. Virick, M., & Greer, C. R. (2012). Links between HR practices and profitability: A role for employee engagement. Human Resource Management, 51(5), 675-696.

  10. Blair, C., et al. (2024). A systematic review of suicide and mental health in the construction industry. Safety Science, 172, 106424.

  11. Bernstein, C., & Trimm, L. (2016). The impact of workplace bullying on individual wellbeing: The moderating role of coping. SA J Hum Resour Manag, 14(1), 1-12

  12. Assaad, R., & El-adaway, I. H. (2021). Impact of the Workplace Environment on the Performance of Construction Projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 37(5), 04021047.

  13. Associated General Contractors of America, Autodesk. (2023). New survey shows significant flaws in nation’s approach to preparing workers for construction careers and how that hurts the economy: 2023 annual workforce survey results.

  14. Nawaz Khan, M., et al. (2020). The impact of workplace bullying on job performance and quitting intentions: The mediating role of psychological stress and the moderating role of core self-evaluation in the construction industry. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5104.

  15. Li, Y., et al. (2021). The effect of inclusive leadership on turnover intention of construction workers: The mediating role of psychological safety and the moderating role of leader-member exchange. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9031

  16. Sull, D., Sull, C., & Zweig, B. (2022). Toxic culture is driving the Great Resignation. MIT Sloan Management Review.

  17. Sull, D., Sull, C., Cipolli, W., & Brighenti, C. (2022). Why every leader needs to worry about toxic culture. Harvard Business Review

  18. Society for Human Resource Management. (2019). The High Cost of a Toxic Workplace Culture: How Culture Impacts the Workforce—and the Bottom Line. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management

  19. Hinze, J., & Gambatese, J. (2003). Factors that influence safety performance of specialty contractors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(2), 159-164.

  20. Gao, Y., Gonzalez, V. A., & Yiu, T. W. (2018). The role of social-psychological factors in construction safety: A systematic review. Safety Science, 102, 11-20.

  21. Construction Industry Federation. (2024). Mental Health and Wellbeing in the Construction Industry.

  22. Gao, Y., Gonzalez, V. A., & Yiu, T. W. (2018). The role of social-psychological factors in construction safety: A systematic review. Safety Science, 102, 11-20.

  23. Meglich, P. (2011). The respectful workplace. Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 23(1), 54-66.

  24. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.

  25. Ibid

  26. Ibid

  27. Brueller D, Carmeli A. Linking capacities of high-quality relationships to team learning and performance in service organizations. Hum Resour Manage. 2011;50(4):455–477.

  28. Hirak R, Peng AC, Carmeli A, Schaubroeck JM. Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: The importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. Leadersh Q. 2012;23(1):107–117.

  29. Huang L, Jiang H. How psychological safety influences knowledge sharing and innovation: A study of organizational teams. Creat Innov Manage. 2012;21(3):256–267.

  30. Kostopoulos KC, Bozionelos N. Team exploratory and exploitative learning: Psychological safety, task conflict, and team performance. Group Organ Manag. 2011;36(3):385–415.

  31. Edmondson AC. The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2019.

  32. Osatuke K, Moore SC, Ward C, Dyrenforth SR, Belton L. Civility, respect, engagement in the workforce (CREW): Nationwide organization development intervention at Veterans Health Administration. J Appl Behav Sci. 2009;45(3):384–410.

  33. Clark CM, Walsh K. Civility in nursing education and practice: Nurse leader perspectives. J Nurs Regul. 2016;7(3):40–47.

  34. Peng J. Workplace civility: Promoting respect, empathy, and constructive communication in organizations. J Organ Behav. 2023;44(2):xxx–xxx.

  35. Peng J. Workplace civility: Promoting respect, empathy, and constructive communication in organizations. J Organ Behav. 2023;44(2):xxx–xxx.

  36. Di Fabio A, Kenny ME. The contributions of emotional intelligence and perceived social support to career decision-making difficulties: The mediating role of psychological capital. J Career Assess. 2018;26(2):xx–xx.

  37. Peng J. Workplace civility: Promoting respect, empathy, and constructive communication in organizations. J Organ Behav. 2023;44(2):xxx–xxx.

  38. Ali M, Bradburn J. Professionalism in the workplace: Key standards, behaviors, and expectations. J Prof Dev. 2018;12(2):xx–xx.

  39. Ibid

  40. Flores G, Gee D, Kastner B. The teaching of cultural issues in U.S. and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med. 2008;83(4):345–356.

  41. de Castro AB, Gee GC, Takeuchi DT. Workplace discrimination and health among Filipinos in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(3):520–526.

  42. Flores E, Tschann JM, Dimas JM, Bachen EA, Pasch LA, de Groat CL. Perceived discrimination, perceived stress, and mental and physical health among Mexican-origin adults. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2008;30(4):401–424.

  43. Saxena A. Workforce diversity: A key to improve productivity. Procedia Econ Finance. 2014;11:76–85.

  44. Flores E, Tschann JM, Dimas JM, Bachen EA, Pasch LA, de Groat CL. Perceived discrimination, perceived stress, and mental and physical health among Mexican-origin adults. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2008;30(4):401–424.

  45. Russell Cropanzano, Byrne ZS, Bobocel DR, Rupp DE. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. J Vocat Behav. 2001;58(2):164–209.

  46. Jason A. Colquitt, Jerald Greenberg, Zapata-Phelan CP. What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In: Greenberg J, Colquitt JA, eds. Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005:3–56.

  47. Russell Cropanzano, Byrne ZS, Bobocel DR, Rupp DE. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. J Vocat Behav. 2001;58(2):164–209.

  48. Yochi Cohen-Charash, Paul E. Spector. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001;86(2):278–321.

  49. Meirav Virick, Charles R. Greer. Diversity climate and group effectiveness: The role of trust and justice. J Organ Behav. 2012;33(3):xxxx–xxxx.

  50. Tae-Yeol Kim, Kwok Leung. Procedural justice, distributive justice, and employee reactions: The moderating role of cultural values. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(2):xxxxx–xxxxx.

  51. Russell Cropanzano, Byrne ZS, Bobocel DR, Rupp DE. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. J Vocat Behav. 2001;58(2):164–209.

  52. Jonathan R. Crawshaw, Russell Cropanzano, Colin M. Bell, Thierry Nadisic. Organizational justice: New insights from behavioral ethics. Hum Resour Manage Rev. 2013;23(3):xxxx–xxxx.

  53. Russell Cropanzano, Byrne ZS, Bobocel DR, Rupp DE. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. J Vocat Behav. 2001;58(2):164–209

  54. Hyunji Moon, Seokhwa Yun, Sanghee Kim. The influence of organizational justice on turnover intention: The mediating role of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. J Bus Ethics. 2017;146(1):1–14.

  55. Huang, Y. H., ChlevinThiele, C., Giordano, F. B., Lytle, B., He, Y., Lee, J., Anger, W. K., Courtney, T. K., & Yang, L. Q. (2025). Developing and Validating a Respectful Workplace Climate Scale with Construction Workers as an Exemplar: a Total Worker Health® Approach. Journal of Business and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-025-10053-4

​

Belonging
The experience of feeling accepted, valued, and connected within a workplace or team. Belonging reflects whether employees feel that they matter and have a meaningful place in the organization.


Bullying
A pattern of repeated harmful behavior directed toward an individual, often involving intimidation, humiliation, exclusion, or interference with work. Workplace bullying typically involves a power imbalance and causes psychological or professional harm over time.


Civility
Behavior that demonstrates respect, courtesy, and consideration toward others. In the workplace, civility includes listening, communicating respectfully, and addressing conflict constructively.


Coaching
A structured process aimed at improving performance, developing skills, and supporting professional growth through feedback, guidance, and goal setting.

​

Discrimination
Treating an individual or group unfairly based on a protected characteristic or social identity, resulting in unequal access to opportunities, resources, or workplace benefits.

​

Duty of care
An employer’s responsibility to take reasonable steps to protect the health, safety, and well-being of employees, including protection from physical and psychological harm.

​

Equity
The practice of ensuring fair access to opportunities, resources, and advancement by recognizing and addressing barriers that affect different groups in different ways.

​

Fairness
The perception that workplace decisions, processes, and interactions are handled in a just, consistent, and transparent manner.

​

Harassment
Unwelcome conduct that creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment or interferes with an individual’s ability to perform their job.
 
Incivility
Low-level disrespectful behavior that violates workplace norms of mutual respect. Incivility may include dismissive comments, rude behavior, exclusion, or discourteous communication.

​

Inclusion
The active practice of creating an environment where all employees feel respected, supported, and able to contribute fully as themselves.


Mental health
A person’s psychological and emotional well-being, including their ability to manage stress, maintain relationships, and function effectively at work.

​

Mentoring
A professional relationship in which a more experienced employee supports the growth and development of another through guidance, advice, and shared experience.

​

Microaggressions
Everyday comments, actions, or behaviors—often subtle or unintentional—that communicate bias, stereotypes, or disrespect toward a person or group.


Mobbing
A form of workplace mistreatment in which a group repeatedly targets an individual through hostility, exclusion, or undermining behavior.

​

Physical harassment
Unwanted physical behavior or physical intimidation that interferes with another person’s safety, movement, or sense of security in the workplace.

​

Power harassment
Harassment carried out through the misuse of authority, position, or influence, often by someone in a supervisory or leadership role.

​

Professionalism
The conduct, behavior, and standards expected in a workplace, including reliability, accountability, competence, integrity, and respectful communication.


Psychological contract
The unwritten expectations between employees and employers regarding mutual responsibilities, treatment, and workplace conditions.

 

Psychological safety
A shared workplace belief that individuals can speak up, ask questions, admit mistakes, or raise concerns without fear of embarrassment, punishment, or retaliation.

​

Psychosocial hazards
Aspects of work design, organization, or workplace relationships that may cause stress, psychological injury, or harm to mental well-being.

​

Psychosocial risks
The potential for psychosocial hazards to negatively affect employee health, safety, or work performance.


Respectful workplace
A work environment where people are treated with dignity, consideration, and fairness, and where harmful behavior is addressed promptly and appropriately.


Retaliation
Negative action taken against someone for reporting, participating in, or speaking up about harmful workplace behavior or policy violations.


Skip-level meetings
Meetings between employees and leaders outside their direct reporting line, intended to improve communication, strengthen relationships, and gather feedback.


Unlawful harassment
Harassment based on legally protected characteristics that violates employment law and contributes to a hostile or discriminatory work environment.


Welcoming workplace
A workplace environment where employees feel accepted, supported, and encouraged to participate fully, regardless of background or identity.

 

Contact: rwi@ohsu.edu for more information

Respect Works is a partnership between:

Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industry

Oregon Department of Transportion

Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences - Oregon Health and Science University

bottom of page